“THE HOBBIT: THE DESOLATION OF SMAUG” Review (✫✫✫)

Be honest, Mr. Smaug: do you need a breath mint?

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is both one of the most satisfying and maddening films of the year. It’s visually splendid, illustrating the joys and perils of the world of Middle-Earth as finely as any movie before it did. It’s emotionally versatile, being comical and lighthearted at certain moments and then treacherous and gloomy in others. The performances are sound, with CGI characters being just as memorable as the live ones. Everything in the film was perfect up until it came to it’s end, which ended on a cliffhanger so big that a slackwire artist couldn’t tightrope across it.

Taking place shortly after the events of An Unexpected Journey, The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug continues the journey of Gandalf the Grey (Ian McKellan), Thorin Oakenshield (Richard Armitage), his troop of dwarves, and the slight hobbit Bilbo Baggins (Martin Freeman). After narrowly escaping the clutches of the white orc Azog (Manu Bennett), Bilbo and the rest of the dwarves venture on towards the Lonely Mountains, only having a few days left until the secret entrance closes, leaving them forever locked outside of the Lonely Mountains.

Bilbo, however, has greater concerns if the dwarves do manage to get inside. Deep within the twisty lairs of the mountain lies an endless sea of gold and jewels, and asleep among these riches is the vicious Smaug (Benedict Cumberbatch), a violent, terrifying dragon that formerly laid waste to the dwarves’ land and took their possessions all for himself. If the company does manage to get inside the mountains, Smaug will be waiting there for Bilbo, and there will be a massive conflict between the 100-foot tall fire-breathing dragon and the small, terrified hobbit.

One of the things I love about The Lord of the Rings movies is that the stakes are set up really well in them. Peter Jackson, who has been writing/producing/directing/godfathering the series since The Fellowship of the Ring has proven time and time again how well he can make depth-defying set pieces and visual spectacles, all while raising the emotional stakes of the movie.

Here is yet another example of what Peter Jackson can do in a movie. Visually, the film is unparalleled. There were many moments in the film that I recalled for being either visually spectacular or heart-poundingly exciting. One of them was a eerily creepy fight scene where Bilbo and the dwarves were fighting off an army of spiders in a cursed forest. Another was a chase scene where the crew was stuck in a line of barrels while falling down a waterfall. Other instances in the film include when the dwarves encountered a giant who could transform into a bear, or when Gandalf confronted an early confrontation of Sauron in his own castle. And don’t even get me started on when we meet Smaug for the first time. Jackson’s visual prowess excels just as much as his emotional involvement, and with each of his movies, he always seeks how to outdo himself from his last effort. I’d say he’s outdone himself tremendously here: the look of the film shows just that.

The performances are just as refined as the action and visual effects are. Martin Freeman was just as charismatic and loveable as he was the first time he was Bilbo in An Unexpected Journey, and Ian McKellen once again does well as the wise, ambitious, righteously-driven wizard Gandalf. And Richard Armitage has gained traction as Thorin Oakenshield since the first movie, showing that he can be more than the brutish tough guy. He’s a more vulnerable, more fleshed-out character here, with deep desires and hidden intentions showing that perhaps will be explored more in the third installment.

My favorite character by far, however, wasn’t even from a live performance. Benedict Cumberbatch was frightening, fearsome, and daunting as the terrible Smaug, his articulate, vocabulary-filled speech lining up perfectly with his sinister, seething voice. The visual spectacle of Smaug is perfect, with the dragon leaning luminously over his small, feeble enemies, while his long, slender, scaly arms and body lunge across the dungeon like an elongated spider. But the vocal performance is what makes him convincing, what makes him more than just a CGI creation and a terrifying villain in his own right. The minute I heard Smaug speaking to a shaking Bilbo, I had shivers run down my spine. The entire time he was speaking to Bilbo in mysterious anecdotes and sinister undertones, I was on the edge of my seat. When he started to attack, I clutched my mouth and stared endlessly at the screen, wondering and hoping for the fate of these characters in Smaug’s way.

In An Unexpected Journey, Bilbo benefits from being a more active protagonist than that of Frodo. Here we have Smaug, a giant, fearsome beast that is more actively sinister and spiteful than the stillness of Sauron from The Lord of the Rings.

Everything in the film is refined to the quality of film that you’d recall from The Lord of the Rings trilogy. My only regret is the copout, cliffhanger of an ending that inspired my theater to erupt into boos and groans. I hate it when movies do this to me. They put in so much effort to make a great film up until the last five minutes, where they pull the rug from under you and say “Sorry, that’s all for now! See you next year!” What was Peter Jackson thinking when he went with this ending? At the end of each Lord of the Rings movie, it ended with some form of closure and assurance that the adventure would continue into the next installment, but you didn’t know how it was going to pan out. It kept us intrigued, and it kept us wondering what would happen next. With this movie, it sets itself up to where we already know how it’s going to end: we just don’t get the payoff along with it.

I quote J.R.R. Tolkien: “Books ought to have good endings.” The same should be said for movies.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

“THE HOBBIT: AN UNEXPECTED JOURNEY” Review (✫✫✫✫)

A journey J.R.R. Tolkien would want to go on. 

The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey is the story I first experienced when I saw The Lord Of The Rings: The Fellowship Of The Ring for the first time. Like The Wizard Of Oz or Harry Potter and The Sorcerer’s Stone, it’s a sweeping fantasy about ordinary characters getting thrown into extraordinary circumstances. So if hobbits, dwarves, wizards, and fire-breathing dragons constituted as “ordinary” in this universe, imagine the extraordinary circumstances that they go through.

Serving as a prequel to the J.R.R. fantasy epic The Lord Of The RingsThe Hobbit tells the story of Bilbo Baggins (Martin Freeman), a relaxed and easygoing hobbit who doesn’t like to do much throughout the day except for eat, sleep, and smoke his pipe every now and then. One day, he gets a visit from a mysterious stranger named Gandalf (Ian McKellen), an elderly wizard who is looking for shelter and a young companion to go on an adventure with. Much against Bilbo’s wishes, Gandalf not only stays in his small village home: he invites an entire company of dwarves, who proceed to wreck Bilbo’s house and eat everything in his fridge.

After having a nervous breakdown and cleaning up his entire house, Bilbo overhears Gandalf and the small dwarf brigade’s plans. Ages ago, the dwarves‘ prized possession, the Lonely Mountain, was overtaken by a vicious fire-breathing dragon named Smaug, who destroyed their village and stole the castle and all of it’s gold for his own desires.

After being betrayed by their allies, the elves, and being left to fight for their land all by themselves, the dwarves are determined to travel back to the mountain and fight for their home. Bilbo must make a decision of continuing to live on his normal, uneventful life, or to reach out, travel with the dwarves, and seek out adventure the likes of which he’s never experienced before.

Remembering that it was only a few years ago when I originally fell in love with The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the RingThe Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey is a prequel that hits on all of the right notes, and then some more that I wasn’t expecting. In comparison to it’s elder companion, The Hobbit is uncanny. It has a wide verse of characters, each one being unique and memorable both in appearance and personality. It has a dynamic and involving story, ripe with exposition and emotion, retaining your full attention despite the lengthy run time. And it has highly stylized set pieces and visual spectacles that excite the eyes and overwhelm the mind. Do not mistaken Peter Jackson’s intentions here: he was inspired by Lord of the Rings when he was making The Hobbit.

And yet, there are so many differences from The Hobbit to The Lord of the Rings. One of the biggest, I think, would be it’s protagonist. Bilbo is different from Frodo, his nephew in Lord of the Rings whom Elijah Wood inhabited so wonderfully. They’re similar, of course, in that they are small hobbits not necessarily fit for fighting, but are clever, creative, and courageous nonetheless.

And yet, Bilbo is so much more than Frodo is. He’s funnier, for one thing, a bumbling, clumsy little hobbit that reminds me so much of the antics between Pippin and Merry in the original movies. He’s also more outgoing, a more active protagonist doing more in the film than just holding a ring and trekking long miles. He does so much in the film, sneaking around trolls, fighting Orcs, going through traps and mazes, and having a first-hand involvement in many of the film’s biggest fights. My particular favorite scene is one where he is talking to a fan favorite from The Lord of the Rings about the possession of a mysterious gold, rounded object. Hint: His favorite word is “precious.”

My point in saying all of this is that Bilbo is a dynamic character in his own right, and Martin Freeman handles the character very well. In the previous movie trilogy, Freeman had four hobbit inspirations to pull from, and instead of following just one of them, he took characteristics from all of them and made a character all his own. That took great talent and risk, and Freeman’s efforts paid off, making a character that I think is the most memorable and charismatic hobbit out of all of them.

Without a doubt, the best film in the series is Return of the King. This film is perhaps the second best. Sure, at times it might suffer from a slight overdose on exposition, but doesn’t all of the films? The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey is an adventurous, ambitious gamble of a film, and it makes me believe once again in the power that a wizard, a slew of dwarves, and a brave little hobbit can have.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

25 Movies Added To National Film Registry For Preservation

The National Film Registry has added it’s newest selection to it’s ever-growing collection of classic films.

Compiled by the United States Nation Film Preservation Board, the National Film Registry is a selection of films that are stored for preservation in the Library of Congress because they are “culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant.” Each year, the NFPB is allowed to add 25 films to the constantly growing list, and this year is no different. Here is this year’s selection of films to be included on the National Film Registry:

13 Lakes (2004)
Bert William’s Lime Kiln Field Day (1913)
The Big Lebowski (1998)
Down Argentine Way (1940)
The Dragon Painter (1919)
Felicia (1965)
Ferris Bueller’s Day Off (1986)
The Gang’s All Here (1943)
House of Wax (1953)
Into the Arms of Strangers: Stories of the Kindertransport (2000)
Little Big Man (1970)
Luxo Jr. (1986)
Moon Breath Beat (1980)
Please Don’t Bury Me Alive! (1976)
The Power and the Glory (1933)
Rio Bravo (1959)
Rosemary’s Baby (1968)
Ruggles of Red Gap (1935)
Saving Private Ryan (1998)
Shoes (1916)
State Fair (1933)
Unmasked (1917)
V-E + 1 (1945)
The Way of Peace (1947)
Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory (1971)

There are some films on this list that you might recognize. There is the Coen Brother’s The Big Lebowski, starring John Goodman as Walter and Jeff Bridges as “The Dude.” There is John Hughes’ comedy classic Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, starring Matthew Broderick. There is Roman Polanski’s horror classic Rosemary’s Baby, Steven Spielberg’s war epic Saving Private Ryan, and even the childhood visual wonder Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory.

But what about all of these other films? You probably haven’t heard of most of them. Into the Arms of Strangers is an Academy Award-winning documentary about the Kindertransport, a British rescue operation that saved the lives of over 10,000 Jewish children during the Holocaust. Luxo Jr. is the Academy Award-nominated CGI animated short written and directed by Toy Story filmmaker John Lasseter and officially spring boarding Pixar into prominence. Perhaps the least oblique would be Little Big Man, which stars Dustin Hoffman and tells the story of a white male child being raised by the Cheyenne nation during the 1800’s.

Regardless of how well-known these movies are or aren’t isn’t the point. The National Film Registry is a prestigious institution that honors the most unique in film, and I’m personally looking forward to adding these films to my ‘need to see’ list.

– David Dunn

SOURCE: Library of Congress, TIME

Sony To Release ‘The Interview’ After Intensified Threats

UPDATE 12/21: It looks like after much controversy, Sony is now planning to release The Interview, company attorney David Boises said. When and how it will be distributed has yet to be decided, but Crackle, the streaming service owned by Sony, is one option that the studio is considering.


ORIGINAL STORY:

Looks like things are heating up for the Seth Rogan/James Franco comedy this Holiday season.

After the infamous Sony hack that recently came out with the spilling of multiple private corporate emails, Sony is officially delaying the release of the Judd Apatow comedy The Interview after many theaters started pulling the film’s showing following the release of an ominous threat from the hackers who supposedly hacked Sony’s emails. The message from the cyberterrorists is as follows:

“We will clearly show it to you at the very time and places ‘The Interview’ be shown, including the premiere, how bitter fate those who seek fun in terror should be doomed to.
Soon all the world will see what an awful movie Sony Pictures Entertainment has made.
The world will be full of fear.
Remember the 11th of September 2001.”

Sony, in response, has decided to pull the movie’s Christmas release entirely.

We respect and understand our partners’ decision and, of course, completely share their paramount interest in the safety of employees and theater-goers,” Sony announced via a press release.

No further plans have been made to release the film in the near future. Check back with updates.

– David Dunn

SOURCE: NBC News, Deadline

Paramount Is Promoting ‘Transformers 4’ For Best Picture

Um…………… what?

Yeah, I thought this was a joke at first too. Unfortunately, my fellow moviegoers, it’s anything but a joke: Paramount Pictures is promoting Michael Bay’s Transformers: Age of Extinction for best picture.

I know, I know, it’s awful. From a considerations banner Paramount Pictures recently released, the production company has indicated support not only for producer Lorenzo Di Bonaventura as the recipient for best picture: they’ve also had the nerve to put in the phrase “for consideration in all categories.” That means they are also advocating Michael Bay for best director and Ehren Kruger for best adapted screenplay.

Again I say: WHAT?!?!?!

I want to give a knee-jerk reaction to this horrible bit of news, but let’s be level-headed here for a second and think on the level of a producer. If you were producing a multi-million dollar film, and you were thinking of your movie as a product instead of a work of art, what would you want to do with it? That’s right: you would want to MARKET it. You would want to get the word out there, get people talking about it, and get people to keep talking about it, because the more they talk, the more money you get in your pocket. If we look at this “for your considerations” package as a publicity stunt to get people’s attention, then it’s a smart move. Hey: it’s got me talking.

That being said, this putrid pile of movie muck needs to stay so far from the Academy Awards that people will think there’s a restraining order on it. I hated this movie, and I think the people of America are right there with me on it. Critics on Rottentomatoes gave it an 18%, while the users gave it less than 60%. MetaCritic gave it a 32 out of 100, while the users gave it a 4.7 out of 10. iMDB gave it a 5.9.

All of these sites have one thing in common: they all have averaged that Transformers: Age of Extinction is the worst-rated Transformers movie out of the series.

Yeah, it’s the highest grossing movie of the year with about $1,087,000,000 sitting in its pocket. So what? Money has never defined if a movie is good or not. Indeed, how many times has The Fast and Furious and Twilight movies made it into the end of the year’s top ten? For Pete’s sake, even The Smurfs had one of the highest grosses in the year of 2011, and that movie was worse than any of the Transformers films.

What do you guys think? Should the Academy give Transformers: Age of Extinction best picture consideration? Or–

No, uh-uh, I’m not finishing that question. Don’t consider this movie for best picture. Don’t consider this movie for best director. Don’t consider this movie for best screenplay, acting, editing, cinematography, score, makeup, or production design. I don’t even want it nominated for visual effects or sound editing.

Congradulations, Mr. Di Bonaventura. You have people talking about your movie. And guess what? It still sucks.

– David Dunn

SOURCE: Cinemablend, ComicBook.com

Benedict Cumberbatch is Doctor Strange

Yeah, you read that right.

A few hours ago, Marvel made the official announcement on their site on who will take on the role in Scott Derrickson’s upcoming film Doctor Strange. It will be Sherlock, Khan, Smaug, and Alan Turing himself, Benedict Cumberbatch.

“Stephen Strange’s story requires an actor capable of great depth and sincerity,” Producer Kevin Feige said. “In 2016, Benedict will show audiences what makes Doctor Strange such a unique and compelling character.”

Rumors about the actor taking on the role have been alive since the actor was in talks for the movie since 2013. Now, it is no longer speculation, and Cumberbatchians can rejoice knowing that their favorite British actor is taking on one of Marvel’s most unconventional heroes.

For me, I couldn’t be more excited in hearing that Cumberbatch is taking on the role. I heard early on that he was being considered among other actors including Jared Leto, Tom Hardy, Joaquin Phoenix, Matthew McConaughey, and Ethan Hawke, but it was never for sure if he was going to take on the role or not. After hearing today that it was going to be Cumberbatch, I jumped with glee. He’s proven himself time and time again how talented an actor he can be, and considering how well he has handled past roles including Sherlock, I think he is the perfect choice for Doctor Strange, and I’m glad that Marvel thinks that he is too.

What do you guys think? Is Cumberbatch just perfect for Doctor Strange, or should he be cast out in place of someone else?

Comment below, let me know.

– David Dunn

SOURCE: Marvel.com, Twitter

James Bond Prepares To Face ‘Spectre’

You have the right to remain excited.

The 24th film in the James Bond franchise finally has it’s title, a cast list, and an official synopsis. It is titled Spectre, and it’s confirmed cast members include Dave Bautista, Andrew Scott, Monica Bellucci, Lea Seydoux, and Christoph Waltz. The official plot description of the film is below:

“A cryptic message from James Bond’s past sends him on a trail to uncover a sinister organization. While M battles political forces to keep the secret service alive, Bond peels back the layers of deceit to reveal the terrible truth behind Spectre.”

For those of you who don’t know, S.P.E.C.T.R.E. was the villainous organization that Bond battled both in some of the original movies and in Ian Fleming’s novelizations. The group, whose initials stand for “Special Executive for Counter-intelligence, Terrorism, Revenge, and Extortion” is lead by Enrst Stavro Blofield, an evil genius who has been James Bond’s rival since the Sean Connery days of Bond. To know that the movie’s title is Spectre and that the group is going to be heavily included in the plot is very exciting, especially with Sam Mendes returning to the helm of Bond from Skyfall.

One question on a lot of fan’s minds though: who is Christoph Waltz playing? Early on when he was rumored to be a part of the film, it was speculated that he was going to portray Blofield. Earlier today, however, the Bond twitter account claimed that Waltz was instead going to portray Franz Oberhauser, the son of Hannes Oberhauser, an Austrian mountain climber who formed a close friendship with Bond before mysteriously disappearing.

So who is he? Is he Blofield, or Oberhauser? Or is he going to do a red herring and might actually be another character in disguise?

All will be revealed when the film releases in 2015.

– David Dunn

Source: IGN, USA Today

 

 

 

<blockquote class=”twitter-tweet” lang=”en”><p>And Christoph Waltz as

“BIG HERO 6” Review (✫✫✫)

“Initiating fist bump.” 

You know there’s going to be some kid out there watching Big Hero 6 thinking “Wow! I want to build a tech super suit too!” Unfortunately, to be able to create something in the likes of Iron Man, you need to have a lot of brains, and that’s something I don’t really have. Intellectual, daring, or different? No, but Big Hero 6 is sure a heckuva lot of fun.

Based loosely off of the Marvel Comics creation of the same name, Big Hero 6 follows a 14 year old braniac named Hiro (Ryan Potter), who has the technical skills that would rival at the levels of Tony Stark’s ego. His brother Tadashi (Daniel Henney) is a science wiz at a slightly lesser level than Hiro, but still brilliant enough to create Baymax (Scott Adsit), a giant, fluffy medical robot who introduces himself and asks you to rate your pain every time he boots up. In many ways, Tadashi inspires Hiro in everything he does, even convincing him to apply to the technology program at Tadashi’s university.

One day, however, the worst happens: a laboratory fire breaks out at the school, and Tadashi is killed in the midst of trying to rescue one of his professors. Grieved and hurt by his loss, Hiro becomes a recluse and tries to avoid his friends. Only by booting Baymax back up does Hiro learn that the fire was not an accident, and that someone had killed Tadashi in the midst of the chaos. Hiro bunkers down, suits up, and arms Baymax with any technology he can give him to go after this mysterious enemy and avenge his brother.

Man, does that synopsis sound like a Marvel property or what? The biggest worries with animated films like Big Hero 6  is that the filmmakers are going to cash in on their franchise’s name rather than actually work to tell a moving, involving story with the great characters they are already given. Isn’t that where movies like Rise of the Guardians and Shrek 3 fell flat? Animators nowadays aren’t concerned with such tedious things to them as interesting characters or a compelling story: they’re mostly concerned with just making sure things are looking bright and beautiful for the little kiddies rushing to the theaters to give them their weekly allowance.

Big Hero 6, luckily, will not waste any of your money, kiddos. One of the best things about this film is that it is a story first, and a franchise second. Hiro is a likeable and enthusiastic little hero, a young man who has some of that rebellious nature that all teenagers like to have going through puberty, but are still intent on doing the right thing regardless.

Even more than Hiro, however, I love Baymax. How is it that such a cute, wonderful, and buoyant robotic character can even exist? It’s rare to experience a character as literal, one-minded, and oblivious as Baymax and have him be so darn fun. There were scenes in the movie where Baymax literally had to scan and observe Hiro on how to do a fist bump, or where he mistakened a cat as a “hairy baby”. There are many times where characters take things so literally to the point where it is annoying, but I was never annoyed by Baymax’s antics. He’s so innocent, loveable and well-intentioned that I just want to hug his big fluffy body when he asks “On a scale of one to ten, how would you rate your pain?

There are a few gripes to be had, of course, and they’re the same as they are with most animated films. The story is mostly predictable. The twists revealed aren’t really that shocking because they’ve been done in every other animated film before. The other characters don’t lend much to the story besides Hiro and Baymax, and are mostly just there so that the team can have six members. And especially, absolutely, does the film have to end in an overly long and exaggerated fight sequence. Why does every movie involving superheroes always feel that they have to do this?

Regardless, Big Hero 6 is both fun and fast-moving, with Hiro and Baymax’s humorous conversations to keep our attention until the next big fight scene. The fantasies of the superhero genre dares us to dream bigger and aim higher. Big Hero 6 is a wonderful fantasy to experience.

Note: Of course there’s needs to be an after-credits scene with a very popular cameo appearance. Guess who it is.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

“INTERSTELLAR” Review (✫✫✫1/2)

A space odyssey led by Christopher Nolan. 

The first time I watched Christopher Nolan’s Interstellar, I knew I had found something special, but didn’t know if I fully comprehended everything I saw. I just finished watching it a second time, and now I understand I’m not supposed to comprehend everything I saw. Interstellar is mesmerizing and breathtaking, a highly ambitious and exhilarating journey taking you through the far reaches of time, space, planets, wormholes, black holes, stars, and anything else in space that you can think of. But just like space, it is also vast and daring, reaching for a vision that it cannot possibly hope to grasp. That’s okay. It’s better to aim for too much rather than too little.

Based off of an idea conceived by theoretical physicist Kip Thorne, Interstellar takes place in the distant future, where the Earth is slowly dying and the only source of sustainable food is by growing corn. Cooper (Matthew McConaughey), is an aerospace engineer-turned-farmer just trying to make it day to day with his small family, consisting of his father-in-law Donald (John Lithgow), his son Tom (Timothée Chalamet), and his daughter Murphy (Mackenzie Foy). Like the great astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin, Cooper dared greater things in his younger years. He wanted to fly. He wanted to explore. He wanted to traverse and discover new spaces that he hasn’t seen before. Now he’s only concerned about making sure his family survives.

One day, him and Murph discover a secret space station that has been hiding NASA, which has been operating in secret since the world state of health has declined over the years. When Cooper finds out that the Earth will soon be unable to sustain life and that his daughter’s generation will be the Earth’s last, Cooper is recruited on a daring space mission to find a new planet that is able to sustain and save the human race.

Written and directed by Christopher Nolan, Interstellar is a testament to the quality of film that Nolan is consistent in making. It has all of the elements that you appreciate in all of his films. It has a grounded, human story intertwined in a brilliantly woven, thought-provoking plot. It has well-rounded, relatable characters that you root for and admire deeply. It has incredibly breathtaking visuals, created with the same visual and cinematic sense of style that is unique only to Nolan’s movies. And it has plot twists the size of Mount Everest, taking complete 180 turnarounds when you least expect it. You will not see the end of this movie coming.

Interstellar is up to par with many of Nolan’s other works, including The Prestige, Inception and The Dark Knight. If I’d continue on about those qualities, however, I’d be writing the same review for those films. It’s easy to write about the things you’ve already seen: I’d like to write about how this film is different from Nolan’s past work.

For one thing, the performances are the best they’ve ever been in any of Nolan’s films, and the heart of this film’s emotion comes from that of Matthew McConaughey. I love how his character is represented in this film, and I especially love how McConaughey handles him. He isn’t handled as a bold science-fiction action hero similar to the likes of Han Solo from Star Wars or James Kirk from Star Trek. He’s more human than hero, a vulnerable and quietly suffering man who just wants to go home to his daughter, but knows he has a greater duty in fighting for the Earth’s survival. I’ve always appreciated the humanity Nolan has always instilled in his characters, but somehow McConaughey reaches an emotional depth much deeper than that of his predecessors. I like seeing McConaughey jumping from such polar opposite roles as this from Dallas Buyers Club, yet giving the same dedication and credibility to both characters. He has proven himself to be an extremely versatile actor, whether it be for small, independent films like Dallas Buyers Club, or big Hollywood productions such as Interstellar.

I am also led to believe that this is the most scientifically accurate out of any of Nolan’s other films. Working closely with Kip Thorne on how accurate the film would be, Nolan worked hard to realize both his vision and Thorne’s, abiding by Thorne’s recommendations and notations as closely as possible. His representation of a wormhole in space. His portrayal of relativity to time and space. Thorne has gone on record to say that there is one major scene demonstrating high artistic freedom, and that is when Cooper visits a planet that has “ice clouds”. This film is intensely interesting and fascinating, and the coolest part to me is knowing that most of this was reviewed by a well-known physicist who has deemed it all possible.

Side note: please excuse me for using the word “coolest.”

There are a few weaknesses to mention. As a Nolan film, it is expected to be extremely complicated, and I admit to needing to see the film multiple times to even begin to understand it. I know many others will have a harder time at understanding it than I did. There were a few slow lulls in the film that detracted from its steady pace, and there were severe sound mixing issues at the beginning of the film that I noticed almost immediately. I’m no sound expert, but when the music is so loud that I can’t even hear what a character is saying, I think you need to fix something before you release the film.

I think it was the third act that really sold me on this film, the last half of the story that compelled me to believe that this was a very memorable journey, and it was. I won’t go into the particulars for the sake of spoilers, but I will say that Nolan is a master at orchestrating thrilling and tense-heavy climaxes. Sure, I would like that to persist throughout the rest of the movie, but I won’t complain. I appreciate Nolan’s ambition, if I appreciate nothing else.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

David Ayer Has Recruited His ‘Suicide Squad’

UPDATE 12/17:

Actress Viola Davis has been confirmed in the role of Amanda Waller, the woman who recruited and founded the Suicide Squad.


ORIGINAL STORY: 

A marksman shooter. A madman and his lover. A military ex officer in peak condition. A criminal with a unique weapon. A master sorceress. And the mastermind behind it all.

These are the characters that will be appearing in David Ayer’s Suicide Squad, the upcoming anti-hero film releasing and taking place after the events of Zack Snyder’s Batman V. Superman: Dawn of Justice. With the cast list releasing earlier today, many are hungry to know who are the supervillains in the Suicide Squad and who will be portraying whom. Here are the biggest names attached to star in the film:

Deadshot: Will Smith

Harley Quinn: Margot Robbie

The Joker: Jared Leto

Rick Flagg: Tom Hardy

Boomerang: Jai Courtney

Enchantress: Cara Delevingne

Few things to note on these casting decisions, especially with Jared Leto. Months ago, there was much speculation over whether Leto was going to portray the Joker in Suicide Squad or not, then a few weeks after that he dropped a tease to the role by quoting Tyler Durgan from Fight Club. Now, the speculation is no more: Leto is going to become the Joker.

For me, I’m okay with this decision because Leto has proven himself to be a versatile, daring actor, taking on challenging and intimidating roles many actors wouldn’t have dared to take and succeeding in his portrayal of each of them. He has gone from playing a drug addict in Requiem of a Dream, to a serial killer in Chapter 27, to his Academy award-winning performance as a transvestite AIDS victim in Dallas Buyers Club. He has proven time and time again that he can do diversifying roles, and I’m confident he will prove that again by portraying the Joker in Suicide Squad.

My problem with his casting is only this: why is the Joker even in Suicide Squad? For one thing, the Joker was never a member of the original team in the comics. Secondly, just like the issue with Ben Affleck as Batman, people are going to pull the comparison game. And who are they going to compare Jared Leto’s Joker to? That’s right: Heath Ledger from The Dark Knight.

I’m not saying that the Joker shouldn’t be in the movie, and I’m not saying that Leto shouldn’t try as the Joker. I am saying that having the Joker in this movie at the moment feels misplaced, and unless screenwriter Justin Marks has a solid plan for him in the movie (i.e., either have him as the antagonist or as a supporting character intended to mock the Suicide Squad), I don’t think he should be included. The Joker isn’t necessarily a “team player”, and he usually double-crosses the people he works with, so it’s a matter of how he’s written for the film that matters the most.

The casting for the rest of the film is sound. I’m a big fan of Will Smith, and I’m excited to know that he’ll be playing one of the most prominent members in Deadshot. Margot Robbie has proven her talent as an actor in last year’s Wolf Of Wall Street, and I’m excited to see her let loose and portray a crazy, wild character in Harley Quinn. It is strange to see Tom Hardy in the cast listing, especially in regards to his earlier DC role as The Dark Knight Rises villain Bane. But seeing that he is playing Rick Flagg, an ex-military man who goes mad after the assumed death of his teammates on a mission, I can see him as a natural choice in this role in relation to his past roles in movies such as Lawless, Inception, and Black Hawk Down. He will be a natural fit within the team.

The only roles I’m concerned about are Jai Courtney and Cara Delevingne. First of all, who is Cara? She is a lesser known actress who is set to appear in upcoming films Paper Towns and Pan. I can’t speak on her chops as an actor, but knowing that her character is the only supernatural one out of this list, I know she has a challenge ahead of her in portraying Enchantress.

Courtney just concerns me. He’s only been in a handful of roles recently, most notably as a overly-macho goon in Jack Reacher, as John McClane’s son in the incredibly disappointing A Good Day To Die Hard, and as a Gargoyle warrior in I, Frankenstein. I’ve seen three of his performances in three movies, and all of them have been terrible. I can’t see him performing any differently in this movie, especially when he’s playing a character as ridiculous as Captain Boomerang.

What do you guys think? Are you excited for your Suicide Squad, or should these actors (or characters) be knocked off in exchange for others? Comment below, let me know.

– David Dunn

Source: Moviefone, Deadline