Sex, murder, and the decrease of the human condition.
American Psycho is a vile, sickening experience, a gruesome and aching film incapable of human thought, feeling, comfort, or emotion. This shouldn’t come as too much of a surprise considering the book in which it is based on inspired this same controversy. Regardless, its achievement cannot be denied: the filmmakers have somehow concocted an experience as brutal, uncomfortable, disturbing, half-lapsed, misogynic, and morally reprehensible as this that they’ve come to completely disconnect with their audience. I rarely feel this upset about a movie like this.
American Psycho follows the story of Patrick Bateman (Christian Bale), a successful businessman who works in his high-level office by day and parties fiendishly with his friends by night. On the surface, Bateman looks like a normal upper-class bachelor. He eats out at expensive restaurants, drinks exquisite martinis, has sex with beautiful women, enjoys swearing gleefully with his friends, and listens to a variety of experimental music. In appearance, Bateman is the visible representation of the upper class: stoic, upright, eloquent, fashionable, and spoiled.
As the plot progresses, however, we come to understand more about the darker side of Bateman’s personality. He doesn’t just have sex with beautiful women: he mutilates them. He tortures them and fantasizes about killing them in horrible ways and playing with their bodies after he’s done dismembering them. His kitchen pantry contains axes, blades, and tools he uses for his killings. He draws his victims in a notebook he leaves at work. A female head sits next to his ice cream in the freezer. If there wasn’t wine in his alcohol bottles, it would probably be blood.
Ugh. Just talking about the premise nauseates me. Why do we need to experience this? Bateman is a sickening character, a man who would dismember the head of one unfortunate female and chew off the genitals of another. Why? For what purpose? His motivations are never explained in the movie and his reasonings for murdering women are a mystery to us. Is there a reason for this? Is there a reason for being so non-inclusive with your audience? Why must everything be shrouded in secrecy?
This is the film’s biggest problem, besides the violence and the sexuality: Patrick Bateman is a deplorable character, difficult to understand and impossible to sympathize with. You might think its impossible to sympathize with a murderer of women anyway, but it isn’t really. We’ve ben asked to sympathize with deplorable characters before, including a psychotic war veteran in Taxi Driver to ruthless murderers and drug dealers in Goodfellas. Sympathy and interest worked with those characters because one character was struggling to find a line of morality and righteousness to follow, and another was hesitant and even regretful over the actions that he’s done.
Bateman doesn’t regret his decisions nor chooses to change them. He kills instinctively, almost like he’s trying to prove some territorial point to the people around him. To put it out there in gruesome, violent fashions like this though is just torturous. Who wants to sit there, eyes on the screen, watching him laughing as a petite blond girl in front of him cries pleading for her life?
But American Psycho isn’t just sickening, repulsive, and pungnent: the film’s logic is half-lapsed, incomplete, and flawed, incomprehensible to the viewer and extremely frustrating to those trying to figure out.
I’ll give you an example. There’s one scene where’s Bateman is chasing one of his victims through the hallways of a hotel, half naked, screaming manically, and revving his chainsaw like Leatherface from Texas Chainsaw Massacre. Someone explain to me how no one from the hotel hallway heard the ruckus from outside their rooms, or anyone from the two floors above and beneath him? Here you have Jack Torrence running through the hallways screaming at the top of his lungs with a lawn mower, and nobody even bothers to call the police. What? Are the wooden doors sound-proof? Who knows, maybe they’re afraid of poking their heads out the door so that they won’t get their heads chopped off.
Due to a revelation revealed later on in the plot, one could argue this is a “dream sequence”, or a “vision” Bateman had. But how is there any way to know? With Bateman’s maniacal, wretched mind, dreams feels like reality and reality feels like dreams. How is there any way to read the subtext when you’ve made your narrative so damn hard to figure out?
And this is a movie that is being hailed as a dark comedy. A comedy for what, exactly? The film is two graphic hours of bloody, sickening, gruesome violence and pornography. When, at any point, is it set up to inspire laughs? In movies like Pulp Fiction and Fight Club we are at least given subtle moments of clever dialogue to clue us in to the humor, and even though stomach-curling things are happening on screen, we are able to suspend that briefly in order to enjoy the humor.
American Psycho is not subtle, smart, clever, humorous, or any of the related adjectives. There’s a point director Mary Harron is trying to express through the film, but that point is convoluted, vague and shockingly illiterate. As a result, what we’re ultimately watching is an idle, pointless, and misconstrued film, and our reward for watching is hours of punishment, nudity, sexual immorality, blood, torture, macabre violence, and sickening indecency. To be fairly honest, I probably need a second viewing in order to fully understand the picture, but the plain fact is that the movie doesn’t deserve a second viewing. If I end the film feeling as punished and as mutilated as Bateman’s unfortunate victims, why on earth would I want to subject myself to that again?
At the end of the film, Bateman himself admits that he finds neither closure nor catharsis for his bloody, violent, sexually immoral and murderous journey. For that matter, neither do we.
First off, no. No, no, no.
American Psycho is about a psychopathic killer named Patrick Bateman, who’s MO is beautiful mutilated women. We’re going to focus on the word “psychopathic”, which according to the DSM, is a person who feels ZERO empathy to others. For example, Patrick Bateman. He is the perfect portrayal of a psychopath, and to my knowledge, the only true picture we have inside the mind of one. He is SUPPOSED to be “deplorable character, difficult to understand and impossible to sympathize with” because he is SUPPOSED to be a psychopath.
The movie, and the novel, further focus on the “yuppie” lifestyle and culture of 1980’s New York Stock brokers and the cutthroat environment, vanity, drugs (mostly, cocaine), and lack of fear of reprisal . So, what happens to a psychopath with no fear or qualms? Obviously, he goes nuts & starts fulfilling his darkest desires. The dark humor (yes it is humor, just apparently not straight laced enough for you) consists of the inane things that sets Bateman over the edge (like the business cards). You want more of an explanation, but there is none (see “psychopathic”, above). The humor, while not obvious and “laugh out loud”, is brilliant in its existentialist nature. Its tragic portrayal of the things we seem important, of the value we place on human life when several can so easily go missing without anyone noticing. Patrick Bateman represents humanity in its callousnous towards itself. We hold human life in such high regard, yet at the end of the day, we care more about our hair products and the font on our business cards than the woman down the street who was just murdered (awesomely) by a chainsaw.
American Psycho is SUPPOSED to disgust you, but not because of Patrick Bateman, but because of what we as humanity have become.
THANK YOU. Also I think it’s super important and relevant to note that the director is a woman. I know we’ll argue about this more in the office, David, but I adore this movie and I think it’s brilliant.